Conflict of interest pays: New revelations show US health officials conspired with Chinese army to cover up origins of Covid

Conflict of interest pays: New revelations show US health officials conspired with Chinese army to cover up origins of Covid


More than 1,700 people have signed a petition calling for the retraction of the seminal scientific correspondence paper, The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2,” which claimed Covid-19 was “not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.”

The paper – sometimes referred to as the Proximal Origins paper or the “Nature Medicine paper” – was published March 17, 2020, in Nature Medicine journal.

It was used by former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci, former National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins and other federal public health officials in 2020 and beyond to dismiss the possibility of a lab leak.

Biosafety Now – a nongovernmental organisation that “advocates for reducing numbers of high-level biocontainment laboratories and for strengthening biosafety, biosecurity and biorisk management for research on pathogens” – on July 19 launched the petition, stating, “It is imperative that this clearly fraudulent and clearly damaging paper be removed from the scientific literature.”

Biosafety’s leadership team includes 27 experts in biomedicine, mathematics, public health, public policy, public advocacy, law and social science.

Bryce Nickels, co-founder of Biosafety Now and professor of genetics at Rutgers University, said the petition seeks “to expose a clear case of scientific fraud and misconduct that has had a major impact on public opinion and policy.”

“The removal of Proximal Origins from the scientific literature is the first step in a long process needed to repair the damage this paper has caused to public trust in science.”

According to the petition, “This paper played an influential role – indeed, the central role – in communicating the false narrative that science established that SARS-CoV-2 entered humans through natural spillover, and not through research-related spillover.”

The petition continues: “Email messages and direct messages via the messaging programme Slack among authors of the paper obtained under FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] or by the US Congress and publicly released in full in July 2023 … show, incontrovertibly, that the authors did not believe the conclusions of the paper at the time the paper was written, at the time the paper was submitted for publication, and at the time the paper was published.”

The recently-released internal communications show the paper “was, and is, the product of scientific fraud and scientific misconduct,” the petition said.

Commenting on the petition, investigative journalist Paul Thacker said: “The thing that’s really the most troubling, which is why it should be retracted … [is] the ghost-writing and the undue influence [of federal public health officials on the drafting of the paper], which we know from the emails by Francis Collins, by Anthony Fauci, and from Jeremy Farrar.”

Thacker – who noted that within only a few days the petition had already garnered more than 1,300 signatures and set the hashtag #RetractProximalOrigins trending on Twitter – told The Defender: “These guys basically ordered up a piece of science – or some sort of publication – that they could then point to, which they all did afterwards, as definitive proof that this thing could not have come from the lab.

“The whole thing was orchestrated for political purposes. It has nothing to do with science.”

Thacker is a former fellow at the Safra Centre for Ethics at Harvard University whose investigative writing has appeared in The New York Times, The BMJ, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Washington Post.

He explained that weeks prior to the paper’s publication, Kristian Andersen – one of the co-authors of the Proximal Origins paper – emailed Fauci and Collins a draft of the manuscript, thanking them for their “advice and leadership” on the paper.

Andersen also invited Fauci and Collins to comment and offer suggestions about the paper, but neither are mentioned in the acknowledgments section of the final version published by Nature Medicine.

According to Thacker: “Both Collins and Fauci then promoted the Nature Medicine paper as evidence of ‘independent science’ pointing against a possible lab accident – Collins in a post for the NIH Director’s blog that alleged the study left ‘little room’ for argument in favour of a lab accident, and Anthony Fauci in a White House press briefing.

“In both cases, neither Collins nor Fauci disclosed their involvement in orchestrating Andersen’s study. This last March, Congress released further emails showing that Fauci helped to orchestrate the Nature Medicine paper.”

Thacker pointed out that the paper, which “has been called everything from ‘research paper’ to ‘analysis’ to ‘study’” was “really just correspondence” that was later turned into a “political piece of propaganda that people could then reference, which they did.”

Describing the recent about-face regarding the paper’s importance, Thacker said: “Now the editor-in-chief of Nature Medicine is saying, ‘Oh, well, it was just a viewpoint … like he’s trying to dismiss what it was when they [federal public officials] used it for completely different purposes. They used it as some definitive piece of scientific research that put to rest any idea this thing could have come from a lab.

“Then we find out internally that none of them who wrote it believed that in the first place. … Quite frankly, from the very beginning, none of the scientific evidence in any direction means anything about how this pandemic started. It’s always been the internal documents and the money that have mattered more.”

Thacker added, “This entire drama and discussion has nothing to do with science. It has everything to do with corruption and a coverup.”

On July 25 Thacker tweeted: Writers Curtis Schube and Gary Lawkowski in a July 24 op-ed for The Hill pointed out that when the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention responded to the FOIA request to release Fauci’s “explosive” email showing his involvement with the Nature Medicine paper, the agency completely redacted the email.

Moreover, Thacker alleged that Andersen submitted false testimony at the July 11 hearing of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, which is investigating the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Andersen’s allegation that Fauci and Collins were provided with the paper only after it had been “accepted” and was in “proof” is false, Thacker said. “Emails impeach this portion of Andersen’s testimony,” he added.

Thacker also pointed out that The Intercept last week published newly revealed documents showing Andersen and his co-author – Tulane virologist Robert Garry – both lied to Congress during the House hearing. The alleged lies covered the fact that both had pending federal grants controlled by Fauci – money that could have been used to influence their positions on the lab-leak theory.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s latest book, The Wuhan Cover-up: How US Health Officials Conspired with the Chinese Military to Hide the Origins of Covid-19,” is due out in September. The book is available now for preorder. Kennedy is the founder and chairman on leave from Children’s Health Defence.

  • The Defender report / Suzanne Burdick, is a reporter and researcher based in Fairfield, Iowa
About author

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *