Uganda legislature bans same-sex unions with a new law after 8 years of haggling

Uganda legislature bans same-sex unions with a new law after 8 years of haggling


The Ugandan Parliament has enacted a sexual offenses law that criminalises same-sex relationships and unions, bringing to an end a controversial a standoff that has lasted eight years. Now people who violate the new law risk up to five years in jail if President Yoweri Museveni assents to it.

The law has recycled elements of a similar law that was enacted in 2013, but which was reversed by the Supreme Court that expressed serious concerns about potential its abuse and misuse.

The focus of the new Bill is to primarily clamp down on sexual violence in general, increasing punishments for sexual offenders while also boosting the protection of victims during sexual offense trials. The overarching objective of the new piece of legislation is to provide for a broader application of the law while repealing some provisions of the Penal Code Act.

According to Jacob Oboth-Oboth, chairperson of the Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee, the bill first and foremost aims to introduce articles pertaining to “post-penetration” consent, which relates to cases in which a person initially engaging in consensual sexual intercourse may change his or her mind and withdraw consent.

Oboth-Oboth said that the new Bill “protects victims of sexual violence both within and out of marriage.”

Pamela Nasiyo Kamugo, chairperson of Uganda’s Women Parliamentary Association, described the Bill as a positive move because “it gives women the right to withdraw consent and discontinue sex upon the realisation that the man may not be protected.”

The types of sexual offences cited in the Bill, however, include a long list of criminalised acts: rape, aggravated rape, sexual assault, indecent communication, sexual harassment, detention with sexual intent, sexual acts with a person in custody, sexual exploitation, defilement, aggravated defilement, procuring defilement, sexual offenses by children, households permitting defilement, supply of sexual content and material to a child, child prostitution, child sex tourism, sexual act in presence of a child, marriage involving children and so-called “unnatural offences.”

It is indeed the latter element that has gays and lesbians in Uganda worried and has renewed debate in Uganda on subject that is frowned upon by conservatives and religion. While presenting the Bill before parliament, Oboth-Oboth was categorical in his classification of homosexuality as an “unnatural act” that ought to be outlawed.

“A person who performs a sexual act with another person contrary to the order of nature, performs a sexual act with a person of the same gender, a person who attempts to commit an unnatural offence, commits a felony and is liable on conviction for imprisonment to five years,” Oboth-Oboth argued in parliament, a position most Ugandans subscribe to.

Isaac Lubulwa, an administrative assistant, says the introduction of such laws, in his view, was long overdue. “Banning homosexuals should have happened in Uganda like a century ago. This is Africa. Therefore, homosexuality is immoral, it is not religious, and it is not natural. Men should marry women and women should be married to men,” Lubulwa argues.

Elementary school teacher Rose Bukirwa expressed her support for the Bill but fell short of admitting whether the element prohibiting same-sex relationships was her main motivation. “The Bill will protect our moral fibre. It will protect our young children and our young generation. It was long overdue,” she said in an interview.

Despite facing serious allegations of election fraud, Museveni’s government appears to be treating the Bill as a priority. Human rights activists in Uganda have declared that they intend to fight the Bill, seeing it as another blow on their quest for equal treatment.

Frank Mugisha of Sexual Minorities Uganda, a local LGBT+ organization, said the law “is extreme, uncalled for and very regrettable.

“We definitely are going to challenge this in the courts of law. This should or will be amended or removed. This Bill, if signed into law by the president, will continue to harass the LGBT+ community. It will increase incidents of arbitrary arrest, blackmail and extortion. Hate crimes and violence towards LGBT+ community will increase because of this law,” he explained.

Mugisha’s view is not just based on an uneasy feeling but is rather informed by his experience with the introduction of the 2013 Anti-Homosexuality Bill, which handed out the death penalty to anyone convicted of engaging in homosexuality.

Although gay rights defenders successfully challenged the 2013 Bill at the Supreme Court on legal technicalities, many LGBT+ individuals in Uganda now fear that this new law has simply brought back elements of the originally discredited Bill.

According to some members of the Pentecostal community, the new Bill also targets pastors who fondle and inappropriately touch their followers under the guise of praying for them. Despite this, many clergymen in Uganda have also expressed support for the piece of legislation, highlighting that it primarily addresses homosexuality.

Pastor Wilson Sewanyana has welcomed the Bill. “I don’t think this law was meant to act against the church or pastors. This law was meant to fight against homosexuality,” he said. “But in church, when we do pastoral duties, we don’t touch people’s privates during prayers. We only lay hands on their heads and they are healed. This Bill will help us to fight the devil.”

While the new law also bans prostitution and places a life imprisonment on defilement, the focus in the public debate has clearly shifted to issues relating to LGBT+ rights, with many arguing that the Bill will be signed into legislation.

President Museveni has on many occasions described homosexuals as “disgusting”, Ugandans hold the view that the law will come into force sooner rather than later.

The law is Museveri’s first acts of government during his new term, which observers refer to as a result of an illegitimate power grab following allegations of rigging and serious human rights violations against opposition supporters.

  • A DW report
About author

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *