The United States and United Kingdom may have abetted heinous crimes against humanity colluding with pharmaceutical companies to hide information on dangerous negative effects of Covid vaccines, human rights agency Judicial Watch, has revealed.

According to heavily redacted information Judicial Watch has obtained from the US Department of Health and Human Services via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, US and UK senior health officials discussed “anaphylactoid reactions” due to Covid-19 shots and emphasised their “mutual confidentiality agreement” regarding the topic.

The revelation is contained in 57 pages of US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) records. A government email exchange from May 14, 2021, also discusses concerns about administering Covid-19 shots along with other vaccines during pregnancy, whose details have not been made public despite the risks involved.

Further, regulatory filings show that Covid vaccine manufacturer Pfizer knew in April 2021 that its drug lacked the publicised efficacy but did not openly acknowledge it until late July 2021.

The information obtained further show that preclinical studies for Pfizer’s Covid-19 shots had warned of rhabdomyolysis, which is the breakdown of skeletal muscles, but the trial reported it was “completed with no safety concerns.”

In the days leading up to the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of Pfizer-BioNTech’s Covid-19 shot, an agreement was made to keep serious adverse reactions under wraps. US and UK health officials discussed “anaphylactoid reactions” due to Covid-19 shots and emphasised their “mutual confidentiality agreement” regarding the topic.

The news was revealed by Judicial Watch, which obtained 57 pages of heavily redacted HHS records via a FOIA lawsuit. Initially, Judicial Watch submitted a FOIA request in August 2021 that specifically asked for:

“All emails sent to and from members of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee regarding adverse events, deaths and/or injuries caused by investigatory vaccines for the prevention or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or Covid-19 currently produced by Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and/or Johnson & Johnson.”

The request was ignored, prompting the lawsuit that ultimately revealed the confidentiality agreement between US and UK regulators.

“Why are we engaged in a secret deal to keep secret information about adverse events related to the vaccines?” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton protested. “I just think it’s troubling. The documents speak for themselves.”

The pact was revealed in a series of email exchanges from December 2020. Initiated by Jonathan Mogford, policy director of the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and sent to FDA commissioner Janet Woodcock and Peter Marks, director of the Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

According to Judicial Watch, “As background, Mogford includes information on ‘two cases of anaphylactoid reactions in individuals with a strong past history of allergic reactions.’

“Marks replies to Mogford: ‘It would be very helpful if our Office of Vaccines could receive additional details [redacted] from MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency] under the terms of our mutual confidentiality agreement.’

“Mogford later replies: “Attached are [redacted] hope that’s helpful in the meantime. If I can just remind – information shared under our confidentiality agreement.’”

An email exchange from May 14, 2021, also discusses concerns about administering Covid-19 shots along with other vaccines during pregnancy.

Judicial Watch notes, “The CDC’s [US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention] Dr Amanda Cohn emailed Office of Vaccines Research and Review Director Marion Gruber and Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks with the subject line ‘Coadministration of Covid-19 Vaccines with Other Vaccines During Pregnancy.”

Gruber replies, ‘I am fine with this language.’

The implication is that the two medical officials agreed to shelve information regarding he negative and dangerous effects Covid vaccines.

Judicial Watch observes, “Marks then responds to Cohn and her CDC colleague, Sarah Mbaeyi: ‘I can live with this too. Please let me know if you want to connect about the adverse event issue later today. Seems like work is still ongoing, but let me know. Thanks.’

Cohn replies: ‘We have a meeting with Rochelle [presumably CDC Director Rochelle Walensky] at 3:30 about if we should say anything or wait until we have more definitive information. I will let you know where we land. I’m not sure there is a right answer.’”

“It again took a lawsuit for the Biden administration to hand over, albeit heavily redacted, information regarding the safety of the Covid vaccines that the public has every right to know,” Fitton said in a news release following the startling revelations.

“This disturbing batch of new documents have uncovered a secret confidentiality agreement tied to Covid vaccine safety issues and emails that raise new questions about the vaccines and pregnancy.”

After initially claiming in late 2020 that its Covid-19 shots were 95 per cent effective, Pfizer’s Covid-19 shots turned out to have rapidly waning protection of just 39 per cent. That figure was reported in July 2021 by the Israeli ministry of health. Pfizer echoed the “declining trend in vaccine efficacy” in late July 2021, but regulatory filings from April 2021 show Pfizer knew of the shots’ failures months earlier.

“It’s clear from the documents that these analyses were almost four months old by the time they became public,” Peter Doshi, associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, told Maryanne Demasi, a former medical scientist with the University of Adelaide and former reporter for ABC News in Australia.

“It’s disappointing that neither Pfizer nor regulators, disclosed these data until it was too obvious to ignore new outbreaks in Israel and Massachusetts, which made it clear that vaccine performance was not holding up,” he said.

Even Pfizer’s six-month phase III trial data, released April 1, 2021, stayed silent on the shots’ waning efficacy. And, at that time, health officials were still claiming that the shot would stop Covid-19 transmission.

In May 2021, Dr Anthony Fauci stated, “When you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health … you become a dead end to the virus.”

According to Doshi: “Publicly disclosing that efficacy waned so soon after authorisation might have undermined the credibility of authorities, who’d been projecting great confidence about the vaccines’ ability to end the pandemic.”

•  A Tell / The Defender report / By Dr Joseph Mercola